Google
 

Kamis, 05 Juli 2007

Oldest Active Transaction

This one sounds easy - but it's not. The oldest active transaction is not the oldest transaction currently running. Nor is it the oldest transaction marked Active in the TIP. (Alas). It is the oldest transaction that was active when the oldest transaction currently active started. The bookkeeping on this is hairy and I frankly don't remember how it was done - now I do -, but that's the rule, and it does work.

Any record version behind a committed version created by a transaction older than the oldest transaction active when the oldest transaction currently active started is garbage and will never be needed ever again.

That's pretty dense. Lets ignore the commit/rollback question briefly.

Simple case: I'm transaction 20 and I'm the only transaction running. I find a record created and committed by transaction 15. I modify it and commit. You are transaction 25, and when you start, you are also the only transaction active. You read the same record, recognize that all active transactions can use the version of the record created by me, so you garbage collect the original version. In this case, your threshold for garbage collection (aka Oldest Active) is yourself.

Harder case: You continue puttering around, modifying this and that. Another transaction, say 27 starts. You are its oldest active. It too can modify this and that, as long as it doesn't modify anything you modified. It commits. I start a transaction 30. You are also my oldest active transaction, and I can't garbage collect any record version unless the newer version is older than you. I run into a record originally created by transaction 15, modified by transaction 20, then modified again by 27. All three of those transactions are committed, but I can garbage collect only the original version, created by transaction 15. Although the version created by transaction 27 is old enough for me, it is not old enough for you, and being cooperative, I have to consider your needs too.

Hardest case: I'm transaction 87, and when I started, all transactions before 75 had committed, and everybody from 75 on was active. Transaction 77 modifies a record, created originally by transaction 56. I continue to read the 56 version. All is well. Transaction 77 commits. You are transaction 95. When you start, I, number 87, am the oldest active. You read the record created by 56 and modified by 77. You can't garbage collect anything in that record because I can't read records created by any transaction newer than 74.

Maybe you know now why descriptions of the oldest active tend to be a little peculiar.

Taken from IBPhoenix

Tidak ada komentar: